Special regulations outlined in 45 CFR 46, Subpart D (and 21 CFR 50 for FDA-regulated research) apply when research involves subjects who are children. Such research is important to obtain accurate data and develop optimal therapies for children, but children are inherently more vulnerable than adults and require additional protection.
When planning a study that will involve children, first consider four main issues:
Only individuals who are “children” under the federal regulations are covered by the additional protections described in 45 CFR 46, Subpart D and 21 CFR 50.
Who qualifies as a “child” depends on local laws for consent. In California, individuals usually can consent to treatments or procedures at age 18, but there are some exceptions.
In California, certain people under 18 years of age are legally able to consent for treatments or procedures involved in research. See the Legal Exceptions Permitting Certain Minors to Consent section for more info.
Other states and countries have their own laws governing the legal age of consent for treatment or procedures involved in research.
Note: California law inconsistently uses the both of the terms “children” and “minors” to refer to people who are under 18 years of age, but they are usually considered “children” in the applicable federal regulations, with some exceptions. Research involving children that will be conducted in whole or in part at the Veterans Affairs Medical Center requires VA approval from Washington, DC, before children may be enrolled.
Describe the rationale for including children in the study in the "Background" section of the IRB Application and also in the background section of the consent form. Analyze what is unique to children in formulating this rationale, as well as in assessing the risks and benefits of the study.
The research holds out the prospect of benefit to children and involves:
Note: Many other examples could be listed.
Federal regulations classify four permissible categories for research involving children, based on degree of risk and type of prospective benefit. These categories are described in relation to “minimal risk.”
Minimal risk means that the probability and magnitude of harm or discomfort anticipated in the research are not greater in and of themselves than those ordinarily encountered in daily life or during the performance of routine physical or psychological examinations or tests.[45 CFR 46.102 21 CFR 50.3].
Describe the study risks in the IRB Application, clarifying what would be standard of care for the subject group(s) and how the research procedures differ from that standard of care. The consent/assent forms need only discuss in detail procedures (and their risks) that are being done specifically for purposes of the study. Also, keep in mind that what constitutes "daily life" or a "routine test” may not be constant over childhood, among children of the same age, or before and after the occurrence of a disease or condition.
Permitted Categories
Below is summarized information on these categories. For complete requirements, see the summary table.
Description: "Research not involving greater than minimal risk."
Consent/Assent:
Type of Review: Generally, expedited review by the IRB. See the Levels of Review page for a list of expedited review categories. Occasionally, full committee review may be required.
Examples:
Description: "Research involving greater than minimal risk, but presenting the prospect of direct benefit to the individual subjects.”
Consent/Assent:
Type of Review: Full committee review by IRB.
Examples:
Note: Although most clinical trials fall into Category 2, it is sometimes difficult to determine what the “prospect of direct benefit” is, as in a study that includes a control group whose participants face less risk than the active group but also less prospect for benefit.
Description: "Research involving greater than minimal risk and no prospect of direct benefit to individual subjects, but likely to yield generalizable knowledge about subject’s disorder or condition . the risk represents a minor increase over minimal risk."
Note: The IRB may approve the study only if the research carries no more than "a minor increase over minimal risk," but the regulations do not further define this limitation. The IRB may consider societal benefits as offsetting risks within Category 3, but only if those benefits would affect a specific group to which the subject belongs.
Consent/Assent:
Type of Review: Full committee review by IRB.
Example: A study testing new biomarkers of disease progression that involves 2 extra samples of cerebrospinal fluid over a year of therapy (beyond the 5-6 that would be done as part of the child’s routine care.)
Description: “Research not otherwise approvable which presents opportunity to understand, prevent, or alleviate a serious problem affecting the health or welfare of children." The IRB must agree with this determination.
The Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services — after consultation with a panel of experts and following an opportunity for public review and comment — must either approve or deny approval of the study. The OHRP website includes a detailed description of this process. Note: Category 4 research is very rarely approved.
Consent/Assent:
Type of Review: Full committee review by the IRB and by DHHS.
Example: A study examining sleep mechanisms in children to better understand sleep-related diseases. Involves 13- to 17-year-old adolescents undergoing 3 hospital visits for IV infusion of acetate and glucose followed by MRI, in normal and sleep-deprived groups.
Federal regulations include requirements for parental permission (consent) and assent from children.
Parental permission is the agreement of parent(s) or guardian(s) to the participation of their child or ward in research. In most cases, you must obtain permission from one or both parents/guardians, although permission may be unnecessary or inappropriate in some circumstances.
Assent is a child's affirmative agreement to participate in research. Mere failure to object should not, absent affirmative agreement, be construed as assent. Assent should be obtained from children capable of providing assent, "[taking] into account the ages, maturity, and psychological state of the children involved” [45 CFR 46.408]. The IRB relies on the expertise of PIs in determining the capability of particular child subject groups and individuals to assent. Assent may be unnecessary or inappropriate in some circumstances.
IRB Consent/Assent Guidelines for Children by Age Group
Age of Minor Participant | Assent Form Recommended | Separate Parental Permission Form Recommended |
Infant-6 years old | No | Yes |
7-12 years old | Yes | Yes |
13-17 years old (Option A) | Yes | No (add line to adolescent assent form for parent(s) to sign) |
13-17 years old (Option B) | Yes | Yes |
Details
In most cases, children this young will not be able to participate in the assent process, and only a permission form for the parents or legal guardians will be needed.
Consent/Assent Notes:
In most cases, children this age will be able to participate in the assent process, using a simplified assent form. A separate, more detailed permission form will be needed for the parents or guardians.
Consent/Assent Notes:
In most cases, adolescents should be fully informed about a study and give assent to their own participation in the research. There are two ways to document their assent.
Adolescent Consent Documentation-Option A
Option A is usually preferred. One form is written for the adolescent subject and the parents or guardians.
Consent/Assent Notes:
Adolescent Consent Documentation-Option B:
A simplified assent form is written for the adolescents. A separate, more detailed permission form is written for the parents or guardians.
Option B is reserved for studies where Option A is not feasible or appropriate. This option can be used for studies with a very complex protocol and/or involving adolescent subjects whose medical condition demands a simpler form than the adult’s form, even when the adult’s form is written at an eighth-grade level (e.g., see Sample Assent Form #3).
Consent/Assent Notes:
Signed parental permission forms should be retained with the study records.
Document the assent of children who are deemed capable in one of several ways (upon approval by the IRB):
In certain cases, the IRB may consider waiving the requirement to obtain children’s assent, for example:
In such cases, the PI may propose a waiver of child’s assent in the IRB application. The IRB’s decision about waiver of assent will depend on the specifics of the study.
Consent/Assent Notes:
FDA-Regulated Studies
PARENTAL PERMISSION FOR CHILDREN’S ENROLLMENT CANNOT BE WAIVED. Subpart 21 CFR 50 lacks the provision for waiver of parental permission, because the FDA says it does not oversee studies for which such a waiver is appropriate. See the section Legal Exceptions Permitting Certain Minors to Consent for info on circumstances when minors may consent to research for themselves.
For Non-FDA-Regulated Studies
See the Waiving Informed Consent page for information on when consent may be waived completely for a study.
The IRB may also waive parental permission in some cases in which the study "is designed for conditions or for a subject population for which parental or guardian permission is not a reasonable requirement to protect the subjects (for example, neglected or abused children)." There must be “an appropriate mechanism for protecting the children who will participate as subjects in the research is substituted, and provided further that the waiver is not inconsistent with Federal, State, or local law.” [45 CFR 46.408]
Examples where parental permission MAY be waived:
Investigators should address all such consent concerns for research with minors, including arguments for waiver of standard consent procedures in the IRB Application.
If there are two parents available to give permission but they disagree about allowing their child to participate in the study, the child may not be enrolled unless that disagreement can be resolved. This restriction applies to all permissible categories.— that is, when both parents are involved in the decision, they must agree for the child to be enrolled, even if only one parent’s signature is required.
Federal regulations — when interpreted with California legal exceptions — permit some minors to consent to research without a parent or legal guardian’s consent. Please note that the information below only pertains to research conducted in California. If you are working in another state or country, consult with local collaborators and describe to the IRB how your plans to enroll children or minors will comply with laws and regulations.
Under provisions of the California Family Code, minors can consent for themselves in certain situations:
Minors 12 years of age or older may consent on their own behalf for
Minors may consent for themselves to medical care related to the prevention or treatment of pregnancy, but not necessarily to sterilization (Sec 6925).
Emancipated minors — those who are either
have the legal right to consent on their own behalf to medical, dental or mental health treatment. They also have extensive other rights to enter into legal and business arrangements, and so can consent to be included in other research (such as surveys or interviews) (Sec 7000-7143).
Self-sufficient minors who satisfy all the following criteria may consent to the minor’s own medical or dental care (Sec 6922):
The California Family Code includes more restrictions and exceptions than can be summarized here. For example, in some cases, the care provider must attempt to contact the minor's parent or guardian. Consult the relevant sections of the law if you are considering enrolling subjects based on these examples. You may also call the IRB office for help in framing a query to UCSF legal counsel.
Consent: With IRB approval, minors in these categories should provide consent and sign the consent form just as an adult would, unless the IRB approves a waiver or alteration of consent. The PI must ensure that any individual minor possesses the mental capacity to consent to the research.
When children are asked to do something by parents, doctors, teachers or other adult authorities, they often feel implicit pressure to agree. Similar issues with social or peer pressure (e.g., for studies in educational settings) may also arise in recruiting children to participate in research.
Describe how you plan to minimize implicit pressure to participate in the "Recruitment" section of the IRB Application. As with all consent and assent forms, the freedom to decline participation should be made clear.
In designing studies involving children, consider any special arrangements for participation, such as scheduling, parking and food, and discuss them with parents if appropriate. Though such information is not required, it could be helpful to parents in deciding about or planning for study participation.
Examples of special study arrangements to consider:
Ethics and regulations: Ethical considerations regarding payment of subjects who participate in studies become even more complex when the research involves children. The regulations offer no specific guidance in this regard; IRBs have varying perspectives and policies. The IRB neither encourages nor prohibits payment of children in research studies, but considers such proposals on a case-by-case basis.
When evaluating this issue, the IRB will apply its usual guidelines for research subject payments. The IRB will also look closely at certain factors such as age, health, socioeconomic and cultural backgrounds of the subjects to ensure that proposed payment does not constitute undue inducement to participate.
Amounts and recipients of payment: At present, $20-$25 (or the equivalent in tokens of appreciation) per subject visit is commonly offered as payment for studies involving children at UCSF. In most cases, the IRB recommends that payment for study participation be made directly to the subject or to both child and parent(s) at the same time, rather than to the parent(s) alone.
Reimbursement: The IRB considers reimbursement separately from payment, and recommends that study subjects or their families be reimbursed for expenses related to research (e.g., parking, travel, meals) whenever possible.
Consent/Assent Notes:
Discovery and disclosure of sensitive information
In the course of research with minors, especially adolescents, you may discover sensitive information about subjects that is not related to the study itself. Examples of such information include sexual activity, STDs, use of illegal substances, HIV status, cancer and child abuse.
Consider how you will handle such situations should they arise. The permission and/or assent form should describe plans for disclosure — or non-disclosure — of such information to parents, legal authorities and the subjects themselves.
Ethical and legal obligations apply whenever child abuse is discovered. Be aware that, in most cases, the same reporting expectations pertain in research settings as in clinical settings.
University researchers may fall into a category of health professionals or others listed as “mandated reporters” under the California Child Abuse and Neglect Reporting Act (California Penal Code 11164-11174.4). Even if your mandated reporter status is not clear, you can make a voluntary report to the appropriate agency.
Enrolling Children in Long-Term Studies
Long-term research studies may involve subjects who are children at the time of enrollment, but reach the age of consenting for themselves (in California, usually 18 years old) while study procedures or follow-up are still ongoing.
If relevant, address the above issue in the IRB Application.
When planning studies involving children in educational settings, consider the following issues:
First, obtain support from the educational community of their target school/subject group. This may include contacting school district officials, the local PTA, and/or the principal of a particular school. School officials and/or teachers may approve recruitment for a study, but they do not have authority to give permission for participation of individual children in research — only a parent or guardian, with the child’s assent, can do so.
The IRB is unlikely to approve use of “implied consent” — e.g., a child brings home information about participating in a study at school, and absence of response is considered agreement. In most cases, obtaining “active consent” via permission and assent procedures appropriate for the subject group(s) is required.
Parental Consent for Children to Participate in Research (§51513): For K-12 students — tests, questionnaires, surveys, or examinations containing any questions about the pupil's or the pupil’s family’s personal beliefs or practices in sex, family life, morality and religion require written parental consent (permission).
Pay particular attention to recruitment issues such as scheduling, payment and minimizing pressure to participate, discussed in the section above.
If the study will be conducted during school hours, an equivalent alternative activity should be offered for students who do not wish to participate.
Special regulations for Pregnancy Testing and Birth Control in minors apply in California:
In California, healthcare providers and researchers are not permitted to inform parents or guardians about a minor’s pregnancy test results, engagement in sexual activity, or use of birth control without the minor’s explicit permission. Studies that require pregnancy testing of minors for any purpose must include template language in the assent form and parental consent form. Minors must give specific, signed authorization to share pregnancy test results; a blanket statement in the research assent form is not sufficient to meet the requirement under California state law. Cal. Health & Safety Code §§123115(a)(1); Cal. Fam. Code 6925.